|
[+]
1
|
2026-01-27 |
COMPLAINT filed by Canada Goose Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24646898. |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
[+]
2
|
2026-01-27 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-2 regarding complaint 1 |
|
|
Exhibit 2-1 |
|
|
(Exhibit 2-2) |
|
3
|
2026-01-27 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. Schedule A regarding complaint 1 |
|
4
|
2026-01-27 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. for leave to file under seal |
|
5
|
2026-01-27 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
6
|
2026-01-27 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Canada Goose Inc. |
|
7
|
2026-01-27 |
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Canada Goose Inc. |
|
8
|
2026-01-27 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. by Justin R. Gaudio |
|
9
|
2026-01-27 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. by Amy Crout Ziegler |
|
10
|
2026-01-27 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. by Hannah Alexa Abes |
|
11
|
2026-01-27 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. by Jennifer Mary Younan |
|
12
|
2026-01-28 |
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
|
[+]
13
|
2026-01-28 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
14
|
2026-01-29 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
|
15
|
2026-01-29 |
MEMORANDUM by Canada Goose Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 14 |
|
16
|
2026-01-29 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 15 |
|
[+]
17
|
2026-01-29 |
DECLARATION of Ellen Kim regarding memorandum in support of motion 15 |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
[+]
18
|
2026-01-29 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-2 regarding declaration 17 |
|
|
Exhibit 2-1 |
|
|
(Exhibit 2-2) |
|
19
|
2026-01-29 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Canada Goose Inc. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
|
20
|
2026-01-29 |
MEMORANDUM by Canada Goose Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 19 |
|
21
|
2026-01-29 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 20 |
|
22
|
2026-01-29 |
NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order 14, motion for miscellaneous relief 19, motion for leave to file 4 before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/3/2026 at 09:30 AM. |
|
23
|
2026-02-02 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's ex parte motions 4 14 19 are granted, and no appearance is necessary. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. The court finds that security in the amount of $41,000--$1,000 per defendantis sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Motion hearing set for 2/3/26 is stricken.Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
|
24
|
2026-02-03 |
SEALED TEMPORARY Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 2/3/2026. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
