|
[+]
1
|
2025-12-03 |
COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24425052. |
|
|
Exhibit 2 |
|
2
|
2025-12-03 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
|
[+]
3
|
2025-12-03 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding complaint[1] |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
4
|
2025-12-03 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal |
|
5
|
2025-12-03 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
6
|
2025-12-03 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited |
|
7
|
2025-12-03 |
Notice of Claims Involving Patents by Dyson Technology Limited |
|
8
|
2025-12-03 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio |
|
9
|
2025-12-03 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain |
|
10
|
2025-12-03 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin Tyler Joseph |
|
11
|
2025-12-03 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lucas Allen Peterson |
|
[+]
12
|
2025-12-03 |
MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
13
|
2025-12-04 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
|
14
|
2025-12-04 |
MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order[13] |
|
15
|
2025-12-04 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding memorandum in support of motion[14] |
|
16
|
2025-12-04 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[14] |
|
[+]
17
|
2025-12-04 |
DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion[14] |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
18
|
2025-12-04 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 2 regarding declaration[17] |
|
19
|
2025-12-04 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
|
20
|
2025-12-04 |
MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[19] |
|
21
|
2025-12-04 |
DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[20] |
|
22
|
2025-12-04 |
NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for temporary restraining order[13], motion for miscellaneous relief[19], motion for leave to file[4] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 12/9/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
|
23
|
2025-12-08 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's ex parte motions[4] [13] [19]are granted, and no appearance is necessary. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and implement the asset freeze. If any defendant were to appear and object, the court will take a fresh look at the asset freeze, joinder, and personal jurisdiction. The court finds that security in the amount of $9,000-$1,000 per defendant-is sufficient to secure the injunctive relief. Motion hearing set for 12/9/25 is stricken. Mailed notice |
|
24
|
2025-12-08 |
SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 12/8/2025. |
|
25
|
2025-12-08 |
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited |
|
[+]
26
|
2025-12-08 |
Registry Deposit Information Form by Dyson Technology Limited |
|
|
SUMMONS - ERROR UNPROCESSED due to need to use new summons form for issuance. Please visit our website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_online/ao440e.pdf?refresh and download the new form and then resubmit. (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
27
|
2025-12-09 |
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
