|
[+]
1
|
2025-11-21 |
COMPLAINT filed by Jonathan Kotyk; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24386638. |
|
|
Exhibit A-1 |
|
|
(Exhibit A-2) |
|
6
|
2025-11-21 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Jonathan Kotyk to seal Schedule A, Exhibits B and C |
|
2
|
2025-11-21 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
3
|
2025-11-21 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jonathan Kotyk Schedule A |
|
4
|
2025-11-21 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jonathan Kotyk Exhibit B |
|
5
|
2025-11-21 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jonathan Kotyk Exhibit C |
|
[+]
7
|
2025-11-21 |
MEMORANDUM by Jonathan Kotyk in support of motion to seal 6 |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Andrea R. Wood. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (qrtr,) |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (qrtr,) |
|
8
|
2025-11-26 |
Temporary Restraining Order |
|
12
|
2025-12-16 |
Reset |
|
13
|
2025-12-17 |
Order on motion to reset |
|
[+]
14
|
2025-12-30 |
AMENDED complaint by Jonathan Kotyk against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identfied in Schedule A |
|
|
Exhibit A-2 |
|
15
|
2025-12-30 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Jonathan Kotyk for temporary restraining order |
|
17
|
2025-12-31 |
ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/31/2025: Mailed notice. |
|
21
|
2026-01-05 |
Local Rule 3.2 Annual Reminder Order |
|
22
|
2026-01-06 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: Plaintiff is directed to file by 1/14/2026, a statement demonstrating why the defendants on Schedule A are properly joined under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 and 35 U.S.C. � 299, and why plaintiff refers to a single "Defendant" in his "Amended Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order" [15]. Motion for leave to file under seal [6] is provisionally granted. Emailed notice |
|
26
|
2026-01-08 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman: In light of plaintiff's Amended Schedule A [23], which names a single defendant, the court vacates its order [22] to the extent that it required plaintiff to file a statement demonstrating why the defendants on Schedule A are properly joined under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 and 35 U.S.C. � 299, and why plaintiff refers to a single "Defendant" in his "Amended Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order." The court directs plaintiff to file an amended complaint by 1/16/26 that names the sole remaining defendant. Further, the court denies plaintiff's amended motion for temporary restraining order [15] because plaintiff has failed to carry his burden to establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits of his patent infringement claim by providing sufficient evidence and explanation of how each and every limitation, as properly construed, of an asserted patent claim is present, either literally or equivalently, in the accused device. Emailed notice |
