TRO101 logo TRO101

2026-cv-09885

Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

法院:伊利诺伊州北法院
发案日期:2026-08-17
原告:Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
代理律所:GBC
诉讼类型:商标
# Date Description
[+] 1 2026-08-17 COMPLAINT filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25535666.
2 2026-08-17 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
3 2026-08-17 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC Exhibit 3 regarding complaint[1]
4 2026-08-17 MOTION by Plaintiff Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC for leave to file under seal
5 2026-08-17 CIVIL Cover Sheet
6 2026-08-17 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
7 2026-08-17 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
8 2026-08-17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC by Justin R. Gaudio
9 2026-08-17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler
10 2026-08-17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC by Rachel S Miller
[+] 11 2026-08-17 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC by Trevor Christian Talhami
[+] 12 2026-08-17 AMENDED complaint by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC against Toyland233 and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
13 2026-08-17 Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
14 2026-08-17 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to the notice of withdrawal [13], plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4] is withdrawn. Mailed notice.
15 2026-08-18 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. The Seventh Circuit has clarified that establishing personal jurisdiction in Schedule A cases requires that plaintiffs show evidence, for each defendant, of actual sales to Illinois customers and of actual products shipped to Illinois. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *23 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Mere evidence of being willing to ship to Illinois customers is insufficient. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint if additional evidence is needed to establish personal jurisdiction over each Defendant under this standard. Additionally, the Seventh Circuit has also ruled that the Hague Convention does not permit service by email to defendants in China. Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Imp. & Exp. Co., 2026 WL 1502198, at *5 (7th Cir. May 29, 2026). If Plaintiff intends to move to effectuate service via email on defendants located in China, then Plaintiff's motion will need to provide individualized arguments for each such Defendant that the Hague Convention does not apply, supported by details of the good faith effort Plaintiff has taken to ascertain the address of each such defendant. Mailed notice.
16 2026-08-18 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
17 2026-08-18 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
18 2026-08-18 MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.