|
[+]
1
|
2026-06-30 |
COMPLAINT filed by Superhype Tapes Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25317523. |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Exhibit 2 |
|
|
Exhibit 3 |
|
|
Exhibit 4 |
|
2
|
2026-06-30 |
SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Superhype Tapes Limited Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
|
3
|
2026-06-30 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Superhype Tapes Limited for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal |
|
4
|
2026-06-30 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
5
|
2026-06-30 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Superhype Tapes Limited |
|
6
|
2026-06-30 |
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Superhype Tapes Limited |
|
7
|
2026-06-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Superhype Tapes Limited by Martin Francis Trainor |
|
8
|
2026-06-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Superhype Tapes Limited by Victor Benjamin Chahin, Jr |
|
[+]
9
|
2026-06-30 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Superhype Tapes Limited by Alexander Whang |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John Robert Blakey. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Beth W. Jantz. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
|
NEW PARTIES: dannip_77 added to case caption. Terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
|
[+]
10
|
2026-06-30 |
AMENDED complaint by Superhype Tapes Limited against dannip_77 |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Exhibit 2 |
|
|
Exhibit 3 |
|
|
Exhibit 4 |
|
|
Schedule A |
|
11
|
2026-06-30 |
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Superhype Tapes Limited as to a certain defendant |
|
12
|
2026-07-01 |
MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (qrtr,) |
|
13
|
2026-07-01 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.(qrtr,) |
|
[+]
14
|
2026-07-02 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Robert Blakey: Plaintiff initially filed a complaint seeking to sue 93 separate defendants in this single trademark infringement suit, see [1], [2]. Once the case was assigned to this Court, however, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, naming just one defendant, [10] and then immediately dismissed the case, see [11]. The case here is thus dismissed without prejudice. But the Court cautions Plaintiff, given the timing of the amendment and the dismissal, that any attempt to initiate a new matter, seeking to assert the same intellectual property rights against the same identified defendants before a different judge, constitutes egregious forum shopping, e.g., Marshall Amplification PLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 1:25-cv-13829, at [22] (N.D. Ill. Jan. 12, 2026); Julie Stiebritz v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 1:25-cv-03459, at 19 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2025), which may not only result in dismissal with prejudice, but potentially in sanctions. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
|
|
MAILED Final Trademark report and copy entry [14] to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
