|
[+]
1
|
2025-11-17 |
COMPLAINT filed by Sara Nemec; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24355922. |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
2
|
2025-11-17 |
Schedule A to Complaint 1 by Sara Nemec |
|
3
|
2025-11-17 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
4
|
2025-11-17 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sara Nemec by Keith A. Vogt |
|
5
|
2025-11-17 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sara Nemec by Yanling Jiang |
|
6
|
2025-11-17 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sara Nemec by Yi Bu |
|
7
|
2025-11-17 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sara Nemec by Monica Rita Martin |
|
8
|
2025-11-17 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sara Nemec by Christopher Romero |
|
9
|
2025-11-17 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sara Nemec by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
|
[+]
10
|
2025-11-17 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sara Nemec by Adam Grodman |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
11
|
2025-11-18 |
Amended Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Sara Nemec |
|
[+]
13
|
2025-11-18 |
MEMORANDUM in support of 12 Exparte motion |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Declaration of Keith A. Vogt |
|
|
(Exhibit 1-2, of Keith A. Vogt's declaration) |
|
14
|
2025-11-19 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery and electronic service of process 12 is granted as to Defendant No. 1 in Amended Schedule A. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendant. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify the individuals or business entities who own and/or operate the e-commerce store under the seller alias, the nature of their operations, all associated sales, and the financial accounts used for their operations. By 1/7/2026, Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on the case. Telephone status hearing is set for 1/14/2026 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice |
|
15
|
2025-11-19 |
ORDER FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND SERVICE OF PROCESS BY E-MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 11/19/2025. Mailed notice |
