|
[+]
1
|
2025-11-04 |
COMPLAINT filed by Bavne LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24297012. |
|
|
Declaration |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
(Exhibit) |
|
[+]
2
|
2025-11-04 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Bavne LLC to seal |
|
|
(Supplement) |
|
[+]
3
|
2025-11-04 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Bavne LLC |
|
|
Declaration |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
(Exhibit) |
|
4
|
2025-11-04 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
[+]
5
|
2025-11-04 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Bavne LLC by Huicheng Zhou |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (qrtr,) |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (qrtr,) |
|
7
|
2025-11-05 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff's motion to seal 2 is denied. "The court may for good cause shown enter an order directing that one or more documents be filed under seal." L.R. 26.2(b). "[A] district court must be sensitive to the rights of the public in determining whether any particular document, or class of documents, is appropriately filed under seal." United States v. Corbitt, 879 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir. 1989). Here, the plaintiff has not shown good cause exists. The plaintiff argues, "If the portions requested were not sealed, then Defendants may take the following actions: (1) closing the e-commerce stores; (2) transferring the money/assets out; (3) opening new stores to continue the infringing activities. Even worse, these defendants may disclose and spread information to other stores that sell infringing products, leaving Plaintiff no way to recover the economic loss." The plaintiff presents no evidence in support of these claims. The plaintiff's conclusory statements alone do not establish good cause. The plaintiff shall file an unredacted complaint and attachments on or before November 12, 2025. Mailed notice. |
|
6
|
2025-11-05 |
EMAILED Trademark request letter to Huicheng Zhou |
