|
[+]
1
|
2025-10-31 |
COMPLAINT filed by Flowbee Australia Pty Ltd, Cedar Anderson, BeeInventive Pty Ltd; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24288447. |
|
|
Exhibit 1 - Patent |
|
|
Exhibit 2 - Trademarks |
|
|
(Schedule A Slipsheet) |
|
2
|
2025-10-31 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
3
|
2025-10-31 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Cedar Anderson, BeeInventive Pty Ltd, Flowbee Australia Pty Ltd by Beverly Luu |
|
4
|
2025-10-31 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiffs Cedar Anderson, BeeInventive Pty Ltd, Flowbee Australia Pty Ltd - Schedule A to Complaint |
|
5
|
2025-10-31 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Cedar Anderson, BeeInventive Pty Ltd, Flowbee Australia Pty Ltd |
|
[+]
6
|
2025-10-31 |
Claim AO 120 Form - Patent & Trademarks by Cedar Anderson, BeeInventive Pty Ltd, Flowbee Australia Pty Ltd |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
8
|
2025-11-04 |
MAILED Patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
|
9
|
2025-11-19 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [7] is granted. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of almost 90 defendants in this case. See, e.g. Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D.Ill. 2020). By 12/5/25, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Tracking status hearing set for 1/9/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice |
