|
[+]
1
|
2025-10-07 |
COMPLAINT filed by Jen Elliott; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24170585. |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
|
2
|
2025-10-07 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jen Elliott Schedule A to Complaint |
|
3
|
2025-10-07 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
4
|
2025-10-07 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jen Elliott by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
|
[+]
5
|
2025-10-07 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Jen Elliott to seal document sealed document[2] |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Laura K. McNally. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
6
|
2025-10-08 |
EMAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
|
7
|
2025-10-09 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff's motion to seal [5] is denied. "The court may for good cause shown enter an order directing that one or more documents be filed under seal." L.R. 26.2(b). "[A] district court must be sensitive to the rights of the public in determining whether any particular document, or class of documents, is appropriately filed under seal." United States v. Corbitt, 879 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir. 1989). Here, the plaintiff posits that "the likely result would be the destruction of relevant documentary evidence, the hiding or transferring of assets to foreign jurisdictions, and the transfer or disablement of the infringing websites." These conclusory statements to not establish good cause. The Clerk shall unseal Dkt. No. 2. Mailed notice. |
