|
[+]
1
|
2025-08-04 |
COMPLAINT filed by Dreams USA, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23834196. |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
|
|
(Exhibit Exhibit 2) |
|
2
|
2025-08-04 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. Schedule A to Complaint |
|
3
|
2025-08-04 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
4
|
2025-08-04 |
USPTO Cover Sheet by Dreams USA, Inc. |
|
5
|
2025-08-04 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dreams USA, Inc. |
|
6
|
2025-08-04 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
|
[+]
7
|
2025-08-04 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. to seal document sealed document 2 |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Robert W. Gettleman. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (Text entry; no document attached.) |
|
[+]
11
|
2025-08-04 |
MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable Manish S. Shah for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 28 USC 294(b). Mailed notice |
|
|
(Request for Reassignment) |
|
8
|
2025-08-05 |
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
|
9
|
2025-08-05 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
|
10
|
2025-08-05 |
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
|
12
|
2025-08-17 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. for temporary restraining order |
|
[+]
13
|
2025-08-17 |
MEMORANDUM by Dreams USA, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order 12 |
|
|
Declaration Declaration of Plaintiff |
|
|
Declaration Declaration of David Gulbransen |
|
|
(Exhibit Exhibit 2) |
|
[+]
14
|
2025-08-17 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. Exhibit 1 to Delcaration of David Gulbransen |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 2 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 3 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 4 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 5 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 6 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 7 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 8 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 9 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 10 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 11 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 12 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 13 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 14 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 15 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 16 of 18) |
|
|
Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 17 of 18) |
|
|
(Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Part 18 of 18)) |
|
15
|
2025-08-17 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. to seal document sealed document, 14 |
|
16
|
2025-08-17 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. for leave to file excess pages |
|
17
|
2025-08-17 |
NOTICE of Motion by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr for presentment of motion to seal document 7, motion for temporary restraining order 12, motion for leave to file excess pages 16, motion to seal document 15 before Honorable Manish S. Shah on 8/20/2025 at 09:45 AM. |
|
18
|
2025-08-19 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Manish S. Shah: Plaintiff's ex parte motions are denied in part, granted in part. The motion for excess pages 16 is granted. The motions to seal 15 7 are denied. The motion for an ex parte TRO 12 is denied in part, granted in part. The court authorizes early expedited discovery to identify defendants and alternative service of process, but otherwise denies the motions. The court authorizes early, expedited discovery pursuant to Rules 26(d)(1) and 45 to third parties to provide discovery in aid of identifying defendants and serving process. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for any of the Defendants, or in connection with any of Defendants' Online Marketplaces shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine the identities and locations of Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. Plaintiff may provide notice of the proceedings in this case to Defendants, including service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3), and any future motions, by electronically publishing a link to the Verified Complaint, this Order, and other relevant documents on a website and by sending an e-mail with a link to said website to the e-mail addresses known to Plaintiff and any e-mail addresses provided for Defendants by third parties. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue a single original summons in the name of "The Individuals and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint" that shall apply to all Defendants. The combination of providing notice via electronic publication and e-mail, along with any notice that Defendants receive from payment processors, shall constitute notice reasonably calculated under all circumstances to apprise Defendants of the pendency of the action and afford them the opportunity to present their objections. All other ex parte relief is denied. Any evaluation of the merits or likelihood of success in this case against over 200 defendants should not proceed without adversarial presentation. The risk that defendants will move assets is not a good reason to proceed ex parte when extraordinary equitable relief like asset restraints are not to be used in aid of collection of damages, and the court doubts plaintiff has any intention to pursue an accounting as opposed to statutory damages. The clerk shall unseal all filings. Notices Mailed. |
|
19
|
2025-09-22 |
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Individuals and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint by Plaintiff Dreams USA, Inc. |
|
20
|
2025-09-22 |
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
