TRO101 logo TRO101

2025-cv-03885

Viz Media, LLC v. The Partnership and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A

法院:伊利诺伊州北法院
发案日期:2025-04-10
原告:Viz Media, LLC
代理律所:Aronberg Goldgehn
诉讼类型:商标
# Date Description
[+] 1 2025-04-10 COMPLAINT filed by VIZ Media, LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23330886.
2 2025-04-10 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC Schedule A to Complaint regarding complaint 1
3 2025-04-10 CIVIL Cover Sheet
4 2025-04-10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC by Karolina Jozwiak
[+] 5 2025-04-10 MOTION by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC for leave to file Certain Documents Under Seal
6 2025-04-10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC by Sofia Quezada Hastings (Quezada Hastings, Sofia)
7 2025-04-10 MOTION by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC for temporary restraining order
[+] 8 2025-04-10 MEMORANDUM by VIZ Media, LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order 7
[+] 9 2025-04-10 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC regarding memorandum in support of motion 8
[+] 10 2025-04-10 MOTION by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLCMotion for Electronic Service of Process
11 2025-04-11 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
12 2025-04-11 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials.
13 2025-04-11 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff should review the Court's standing order on "Schedule A" Cases, available at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?IuUaWzNcEoPr4PHl9tvcGaMUezk8AnJ1 under the "Case Procedures" tab. As explained there, Plaintiff must complete and file the template linked on that page before the Court will consider granting any motion for preliminary injunctive relief. The submission must also provide a listing of all prior Schedule A cases filed in any court in the United States in which Plaintiff was a plaintiff, and a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that Plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Finally, by filing the template, Plaintiff certifies that Plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence supplied in support of a motion for a TRO in this case in any prior proceeding. If the template is not completed by April 18, 2025, the Court may dismiss this matter for failure to prosecute. The Court declines to rule on the pending motions until a completed template is filed. Mailed notice.
14 2025-04-17 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC Schedule A Template
18 2025-04-22 SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Partnership and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A
20 2025-04-30 MOTION by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC for extension of time for Temporary Restraining Order
21 2025-05-01 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion to extend the TRO 20 is granted. The TRO is extended to May 19, 2025. Mailed notice.
22 2025-05-14 MOTION by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC for preliminary injunction
23 2025-05-15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects by May 21, 2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering the TRO, the TRO is extended until the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice.
25 2025-05-22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 22 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 24 that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. The Clerk shall unseal any documents that are sealed. The Law Firm of Aronberg Goldgehn Davis & Garmisa, is ordered to add ALL defendant names listed in the Schedule A to the docket within five business days, instructions can be found on the Court's website at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_cmecf/pdfs/v60/Add_Terminate_Instructions.pdf. Mailed notice.
26 2025-05-22 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 5/22/2025. Mailed notice.
[+] 27 2025-05-22 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: By June 12, 2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report regarding next steps in this case. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for default judgment, it should be filed by that date, and if Plaintiff moves for default judgment as to all Defendants, no status report need be filed. Mailed notice.
28 2025-05-23 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by VIZ Media, LLC of Certain Defendants
29 2025-06-06 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by VIZ Media, LLC of Certain Defendants
31 2025-06-12 MOTION by Plaintiff VIZ Media, LLC for default judgment as to remaining defendants
33 2025-06-13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment against all Defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before June 20, 2025. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by June 17, 2025. A hearing may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Mailed notice.
34 2025-06-13 DECLARATION of Karolina Jozwiak regarding order on motion for default judgment, text entry, 33
35 2025-06-23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: No remaining Defendant has responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 31 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The Clerk is directed to return the surety bond posted. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice.
36 2025-06-23 DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 6/23/2025. Mailed notice.
37 2025-06-30 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by VIZ Media, LLC of remaining defendants
38 2025-07-10 FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment in the amount of $100,000 of Certain Defendants