|
[+]
1
|
2025-03-20 |
COMPLAINT filed by Eicher Motors Limited; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23234204. |
|
|
(Exhibit 1) |
|
2
|
2025-03-20 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet |
|
3
|
2025-03-20 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited by Michael A. Hierl |
|
4
|
2025-03-20 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited by William Benjamin Kalbac |
|
5
|
2025-03-20 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
|
6
|
2025-03-20 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited by John Wilson |
|
7
|
2025-03-20 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
|
8
|
2025-03-20 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited Sealed Schedule A |
|
[+]
9
|
2025-03-20 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Eicher Motors Limited |
|
|
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable John F. Kness. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 2). |
|
|
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. |
|
10
|
2025-03-20 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation |
|
11
|
2025-03-20 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
|
[+]
12
|
2025-03-20 |
MEMORANDUM by Eicher Motors Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 11 |
|
|
Declaration Ribchester Declaration |
|
|
Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Declaration Hierl Declaration |
|
|
Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 1 |
|
|
Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 2 |
|
|
Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 3 |
|
|
(Exhibit Hierl Exhibit 4) |
|
13
|
2025-03-20 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Ribchester Declaration |
|
14
|
2025-03-20 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Ribchester Declaration |
|
15
|
2025-03-20 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Ribchester Declaration |
|
16
|
2025-03-20 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Eicher Motors Limited Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Ribchester Declaration |
|
17
|
2025-03-20 |
Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Eicher Motors Limited |
|
18
|
2025-03-21 |
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
|
19
|
2025-03-21 |
MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
|
20
|
2025-03-25 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: On the Court's initiative, all pending motions are held in abeyance, and the case is stayed pending further order. This stay, which the Court is entering in other so-called "Schedule A" cases on its docket where requests for temporary restraining orders remain pending, is intended to permit the Court the opportunity to reassess its previous approach in Schedule A litigation involving Lanham Act, Copyright Act, and Patent Act claims typically brought on an ex parte basis against various online merchants. This reassessment will consider, among other things, whether: (1) ex parte proceedings are appropriate in these types of cases; (2) the routine sealing of parts or all of the docket is appropriate; (3) the routine granting of temporary restraining orders on an ex parte basis is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; (4) the routine granting of prejudgment asset restraints is a sound exercise of judicial discretion; and (5) the mass joinder of defendants is appropriate under the circumstances typically present in Schedule A cases. Plaintiff remains free, of course, to dismiss this action voluntarily if they wish to pursue their claims in another District, but no supplemental briefing on the pending motions may be filed absent advance leave of Court. Mailed notice. |
|
21
|
2025-08-08 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, which is being entered separately, Plaintiff's motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order and prejudgment asset restraint (Dkt. 11) is denied. Plaintiff's motion to seal (Dkt. 7) is granted subject to later reconsideration; the documents provisionally filed under seal (Dkt. 8, 1316) may remain under seal for the time being. The request for alternative service (Dkt. 11) and motion for leave to file excess pages (Dkt. 10) is granted. An in-person status hearing is set for 8/19/2025 at 9:30 A.M.; lead counsel must appear in person at the hearing, which will be stricken if Plaintiff elects to dismiss this action voluntarily.Mailed notice |
|
22
|
2025-08-08 |
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/8/2025.Mailed notice |
|
23
|
2025-08-15 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Due to a change in the Court's schedule, the in-person status hearing set for 8/19/2025 at 9:30 A.M. is reset for 8/19/2025 at 3:00 P.M. TIME CHANGE ONLY. Mailed notice. |
|
24
|
2025-08-19 |
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Eicher Motors Limited Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of All Remaining Defendants |
|
25
|
2025-08-19 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal 24. Accordingly, the in-person hearing set for today, 8/19/2025, is stricken. Further guidance will be provided by separate order. Mailed notice. |
|
26
|
2025-08-20 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal 24. Because the notice was filed before the opposing parties served either an answer or a motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed without prejudice consistent with the terms of the notice and by operation of Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 587 (7th Cir. 2011) (Rule 41(a)(1)(A) notice of dismissal "is self-executing and effective without further action from the court"). Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
|
27
|
2025-08-21 |
MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
