TRO101 logo TRO101

2023-cv-06705

General Motors LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

法院:伊利诺伊州北法院
发案日期:2023-08-31
原告:General Motors LLC
代理律所:GBC
诉讼类型:商标
# Date Description
[+] 1 2023-08-31 COMPLAINT filed by General Motors LLC; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20995894.
2 2023-08-31 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff General Motors LLC Schedule A regarding complaint[1]
3 2023-08-31 MOTION by Plaintiff General Motors LLC for leave to file under seal
4 2023-08-31 CIVIL Cover Sheet
5 2023-08-31 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by General Motors LLC
6 2023-08-31 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by General Motors LLC
7 2023-08-31 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff General Motors LLC by Justin R. Gaudio
8 2023-08-31 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff General Motors LLC by Amy Crout Ziegler
9 2023-08-31 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff General Motors LLC by Jake Michael Christensen
[+] 10 2023-08-31 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff General Motors LLC by Rachel S Miller
11 2023-09-01 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA
12 2023-09-01 MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials
13 2023-09-07 MOTION by Plaintiff General Motors LLC for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery
14 2023-09-07 MEMORANDUM by General Motors LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order[13]
[+] 15 2023-09-07 DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]
[+] 16 2023-09-07 DECLARATION of Andrea Ankawi regarding memorandum in support of motion[14]
17 2023-09-07 SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff General Motors LLC Exhibit 2 - Parts 1-9 regarding declaration[16]
18 2023-09-07 MOTION by Plaintiff General Motors LLC for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3)
19 2023-09-07 MEMORANDUM by General Motors LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[18]
[+] 20 2023-09-07 DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[19]
21 2023-11-20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [3], ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order [13], and motion for electronic service of process [18] are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions (e.g., Dkt. [15], [16]) establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries [2] and [17]. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis under FRCP 65(b)(1). Specifically, and as noted above, were Defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying Defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an equitable accounting. In addition, the Court finds, at least for now on this limited and one-sided record and without prejudice to revisiting the issue, that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendants because they directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois. Specifically, Defendants have targeted sales to Illinois residents by setting up and operating e-commerce stores that target United States consumers using one or more Seller Aliases, offer shipping to the United States, including Illinois, accept payment in U.S. dollars, and have sold products using infringing and counterfeit versions of Plaintiff's trademarks to residents of Illinois. The evidence presented to the Court also shows that Plaintiff has demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to Defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As several judges have previously noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all Defendants in this one action and whether Plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any Defendant appears and objects, the Court will reconsider the asset freeze and joinder. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice
[+] 22 2023-11-20 SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 11/20/2023
23 2023-11-29 MOTION by Plaintiff General Motors LLC for extension of time of Temporary Restraining Order
[+] 24 2023-11-29 MEMORANDUM by General Motors LLC in support of extension of time[23]
26 2023-11-30 SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by General Motors LLC. (Document not scanned)
25 2023-12-01 EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER granting motion [23] signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 12/1/2023. Mailed notice
[+] 27 2023-12-13 MOTION by Plaintiff General Motors LLC for preliminary injunction as to Certain Defendants
[+] 28 2023-12-13 MEMORANDUM by General Motors LLC in support of motion for preliminary injunction[27]
[+] 29 2023-12-13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by General Motors LLC as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 12/13/2023, answer due 1/3/2024.
30 2023-12-18 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff General Motors LLC by Marcella Deshonda Slay
31 2023-12-21 MOTION by Attorney Jake M. Christensen to withdraw as attorney for General Motors LLC. No party information provided
32 2023-12-21 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by General Motors LLC as to certain defendant
33 2023-12-21 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion [27] for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 12/27/2023." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the temporary restraining order ("TRO"), the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice
[+] 34 2023-12-21 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff General Motors LLC per [33]
35 2023-12-28 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by General Motors LLC as to certain defendants
36 2023-12-28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Motion by counsel to withdraw as attorney [31] is granted. Attorney Jake Michael Christensen is withdrawn as counsel of record. Mailed notice.
37 2023-12-28 ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/2023: Mailed notice.
38 2024-01-04 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by General Motors LLC as to certain defendants
39 2024-01-11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by General Motors LLC as to certain defendants
40 2024-01-18 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by General Motors LLC as to certain defendants
41 2024-02-01 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by General Motors LLC as to certain defendants
42 2024-02-08 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by General Motors LLC as to certain defendants
43 2024-02-23 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [27] is granted. Enter separate preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's filings establish that Plaintiff has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [44] that it provided electronic notice to Defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but, despite being given [33] the opportunity to do so, no Defendant has objected to the motion for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all Defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the docket within five business days. The Clerk is directed to unseal any and all previously-sealed documents. Mailed notice.
[+] 44 2024-02-23 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 2/23/2024. Mailed notice.
[+] 45 2024-02-26 SUMMONS Returned Executed by General Motors LLC as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/26/2024, answer due 3/18/2024.
[+] 46 2024-03-25 MOTION by Plaintiff General Motors LLC for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff General Motors LLC for default judgment as to all Defendants
[+] 47 2024-03-25 MEMORANDUM by General Motors LLC in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment[46]
[+] 48 2024-03-25 DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion[47]
49 2024-03-27 ORDER: The motion [46] seeking a default judgment is granted. Enter separate Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 3/27/2024. Mailed notice.
50 2024-03-27 FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 3/27/2024. Mailed notice.
51 2024-03-28 MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
52 2024-04-04 FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order[50] in the amount of $100,000 as to certain defendants
53 2024-05-16 FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment regarding order[50] in the amount of $100,000 as to certain defendant