TRO101 logo TRO101

2023-cv-00604

Zorro Productions, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A Hereto

法院:伊利诺伊州北法院
发案日期:2023-01-02
原告:Zorro Productions, Inc.
代理律所:HSP
诉讼类型:商标
# Date Description
[+] 1 2023-02-01 COMPLAINT filed by Zorro Productions, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20304746.
2 2023-02-01 CIVIL Cover Sheet
3 2023-02-01 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. by Michael A. Hierl
4 2023-02-01 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. by William Benjamin Kalbac
5 2023-02-01 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. by Robert Payton Mcmurray
6 2023-02-01 MOTION by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
7 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Sealed Schedule A
[+] 8 2023-02-01 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Zorro Productions, Inc.
9 2023-02-01 MOTION by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation
10 2023-02-01 MOTION by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication
[+] 11 2023-02-01 MEMORANDUM by Zorro Productions, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 10
12 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 1 of Gertz Declaration
13 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 2 of Gertz Declaration
14 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 3 of Gertz Declaration
15 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 4 of Gertz Declaration
16 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 5 of Gertz Declaration
17 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 6 of Gertz Declaration
18 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 7 of Gertz Declaration
19 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 8 of Gertz Declaration
20 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 9 of Gertz Declaration
21 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 10 of Gertz Declaration
22 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 11 of Gertz Declaration
23 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 12 of Gertz Declaration
24 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 13 of Gertz Declaration
25 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 14 of Gertz Declaration
26 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 15 of Gertz Declaration
27 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 16 of Gertz Declaration
28 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 17 of Gertz Declaration
29 2023-02-01 SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Exhibit 2 Part 18 of Gertz Declaration
30 2023-02-01 Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Zorro Productions, Inc.
[+] 31 2023-02-02 MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA.
32 2023-04-12 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 6, motion for leave to file excess pages 9, and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order and other relief 10 are granted in part. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were Defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of Plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that Defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, Plaintiff may for now file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal and appearing at docket entries 7 and 12 through 29. The accompanying Temporary Restraining Order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating Plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping Defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by Plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to Plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to Defendants. As other judges in this District have noted, there may be reason to question both the propriety of the joinder of all Defendants in this one action and whether Plaintiff will pursue an accounting (which Plaintiff asserts as justification for an asset freeze), but at this preliminary stage, the court is persuaded that Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence of coordinated activity and the prospect of an accounting to justify the requested relief as to all Defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asset freeze. If any defendant appears and objects, the court will revisit the asset freeze and joinder. Enter Sealed Temporary Restraining Order. Mailed notice
33 2023-04-12 SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 4/12/2023.
35 2023-04-18 SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Zorro Productions, Inc. (Document not scanned).
34 2023-04-19 MOTION by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order
36 2023-04-21 ORDER TO EXTEND THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 4/21/2023. Mailed notice
[+] 37 2023-05-05 MOTION by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction
38 2023-05-05 MEMORANDUM by Zorro Productions, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 37
39 2023-05-05 DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 37
40 2023-05-05 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zorro Productions, Inc. as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 5/5/2023, answer due 5/26/2023.
41 2023-05-09 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 37 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, which is entered and continued, Plaintiff must forthwith serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects on or before 5/12/2023." Plaintiff must file proof of service of the Court's statement within two business days of service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering and extending the temporary restraining order ("TRO"), as well as in Plaintiff's motion 11 to extend the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice
42 2023-05-10 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc.
43 2023-05-25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zorro Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Certain Defendants
44 2023-06-01 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zorro Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant No.34
45 2023-06-12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zorro Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendant No. 38
46 2023-06-28 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 37 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 42 that it provided electronic notice to Defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of any Defendant. Enter preliminary injunction order. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to ensure that all Defendants listed on Schedule A are added to the Court's docket within five business days. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously sealed documents. Mailed notice
[+] 47 2023-06-28 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 6/28/2023. Mailed notice
48 2023-07-10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zorro Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendants No. 28, 36, 44
49 2023-08-15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Zorro Productions, Inc. Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to Defendants No. 16, 19
50 2023-08-18 DECLARATION of William B. Kalbac Declaration of Service
51 2023-08-18 MOTION by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A
[+] 52 2023-08-18 MEMORANDUM by Zorro Productions, Inc. in support of motion for default judgment 51
[+] 53 2023-08-18 DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 51
54 2023-08-25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John F. Kness: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 51 for entry of default and default judgment against all Defendants. All remaining Defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 8/30/2023. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within two business days of its entry on the docket and must file proof of service within three business of service being effected. Mailed notice
55 2023-08-25 CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Zorro Productions, Inc. Proof of Service
56 2023-08-31 ORDER: No Defendant has responded to Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. 51) for entry of default judgment, no Defendant has responded. Accordingly, the motion is granted. Because Defendants directly target their business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 934 (N.D. Ill. 2016). Plaintiff has presented screenshot evidence that each Defendant Internet Store is reaching out to do business with Illinois residents by operating one or more commercial, interactive Internet Stores through which Illinois residents can and do purchase infringing products. See, e.g., Dkt. 11. In addition, based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction is warranted. The infringement of Plaintiff's marks irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. Defendants' infringement was willful and statutory damages are thus awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by Defendants (Plaintiff has not sought an accounting of profits), the value of Plaintiff's brands, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court finds that $100,000 per distinct Defendant is an appropriate award of statutory damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(2) for Defendants' willful use of counterfeit trademarks. Enter separate Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/31/2023. Mailed notice.
57 2023-08-31 FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable John F. Kness on 8/31/2023. Mailed notice.
58 2023-09-12 SATISFACTION of Judgment
59 2023-10-19 SATISFACTION of Judgment
60 2023-11-14 SATISFACTION of Judgment